SHOCKING NEWS: Jeanine Pirro DEMANDS NFL CANCEL Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl Halftime Show

The NFL thought it was making a triumphant announcement when it confirmed that global megastar Bad Bunny would headline the Super Bowl LX Halftime Show in 2026. Instead, it ignited a cultural firestorm.

Within hours, Fox News host Jeanine Pirro launched a blistering attack on the league, calling for the performance to be canceled and accusing the NFL of betraying its loyal fans. What should have been a celebratory moment for the world’s most-watched sporting event quickly escalated into one of the most heated political controversies in recent Super Bowl history.

Pirro’s response was anything but measured. In a furious monologue that dominated social media within minutes, she accused the NFL of turning the halftime show into a political weapon. According to Pirro, the choice of Bad Bunny was not about music or entertainment but about pushing a globalist agenda designed to humiliate Americans who value tradition.

“Bad Bunny is not about music — this is a scheme. The NFL has turned America’s biggest stage into a tool to impose political agendas and mock its most loyal fans,” she declared, her words echoing far beyond Fox News’ audience and sparking outrage across the country.

The NFL, sensing the growing backlash, quickly issued a statement defending its choice. League officials insisted that selecting Bad Bunny had nothing to do with politics and was simply meant to highlight diversity and the global influence of music.

“Our choice of Bad Bunny reflects the diversity and global power of today’s artists. The Super Bowl halftime show has always been about uniting people through music, not dividing them through politics,” the NFL’s statement read.

Yet the league’s attempt to calm the storm only seemed to fuel further anger. Many fans dismissed the explanation as disingenuous, arguing that the league was out of touch with its base and blind to the cultural message its decision had sent.

The reaction from fans was swift and fierce. Across social media platforms, anger poured out in waves as hashtags like #BoycottNFL and #CancelBadBunnyShow surged to the top of trending lists. Viewers vented that the NFL had abandoned its roots, with one post insisting the Super Bowl had been transformed from a national tradition into a political stage.

Others, however, defended the choice, celebrating it as a bold and historic moment. Younger audiences, particularly within Latino communities, embraced the announcement as proof that the Super Bowl could serve as a global stage for voices long underrepresented in American culture.

The divide was clear: one side seeing betrayal, the other progress.

At the center of this storm sits Bad Bunny himself. Known for breaking records on streaming platforms and selling out stadiums across continents, he is one of the most popular artists alive today. His music transcends genres and borders, appealing to fans far beyond Latin America.

But with his name now tied to this controversy, the spotlight on him has turned political. Critics argue that his presence at the Super Bowl is a deliberate affront to traditional American culture, while his supporters frame him as the perfect symbol of modern America — diverse, global, and unapologetically unconventional.

What was supposed to be a career milestone has become a political lightning rod.

This is hardly the first time the Super Bowl halftime show has been embroiled in controversy. In past years, performances by Beyoncé, Jennifer Lopez, and Shakira drew scrutiny for symbolic gestures and perceived political undertones. Yet the announcement of Bad Bunny feels different. It has tapped into deeper cultural anxieties about identity, tradition, and the role of entertainment in shaping national values.

Jeanine Pirro’s warning was sharp: “The NFL has crossed a line. Super Bowl LX is no longer just a game or a show — it’s becoming a political battlefield.”